On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Matt Helsley <matthltc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > True, though I don't think it's as simple as just enabling lockdep. My > understanding is you won't be able to determine if locks could ever be > taken out of order unless all of the cgroup systems are enabled and they > are all in the same cgroup hierarchy. I wonder how hard it would be to extend lockdep to give a "signature" of locking operations from point A to point B? Then you could just compare a new subsystem with all existing subsystems without actually running with it. Paul _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
