On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 06:28:07PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote: > CC: Paul Jackson <pj@xxxxxxx> > > Dhaval Giani wrote: > > [put in the wrong alias for containers list correcting it.] > > > > On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 03:15:45PM +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote: > >> Hi Paul, > >> > >> Attaching PID 0 to a cgroup caused the current task to be attached to > >> the cgroup. Looking at the code, > >> > > [...] > > >> > >> I was wondering, why this was done. It seems to be unexpected behavior. > >> Wouldn't something like the following be a better response? (I've used > >> EINVAL, but I can change it to ESRCH if that is better.) > >> > > Why is it unexpected? it follows the behavior of cpuset, so this patch will > break backward compatibility of cpuset. Ah, I was not aware of that. Thanks! > > But it's better to document this. > Yes please. > ----------------------------------------- > > Document the following cgroup usage: > # echo 0 > /dev/cgroup/tasks > > Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > cgroups.txt | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/cgroups.txt b/Documentation/cgroups.txt > index 824fc02..213f533 100644 > --- a/Documentation/cgroups.txt > +++ b/Documentation/cgroups.txt > @@ -390,6 +390,10 @@ If you have several tasks to attach, you have to do it one after another: > ... > # /bin/echo PIDn > tasks > > +You can attach the current task by echoing 0: > + > +# /bin/echo 0 > tasks > + > 3. Kernel API > ============= > > -- regards, Dhaval _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers