Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, guys. Sorry about the long silence. Recent releases of > popular distros overwhelmed me with ata bugs. They now seem to be > under control (and hopefully stay that way for some time to come). > > On the previous iteration, I was hoping I could sort out sysfs > interface problem before this patchset but given that this is a long > overdue feature, I think we should get this thing working first. > > The first four patches looked good to me, so feel free to add > Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Benjamin Thery Wrote: >> sysfs: sysfs_chmod_file handle multiple superblocks >> >> Teach sysfs_chmod_file how to handle multiple sysfs >> superblocks. > > I think it would be great if sysfs_chmod_file can do all-or-nothing > instead of failing half way through but given the interface of > notify_change(), it could be difficult to implement. Any ideas? Is it acceptable to queue the notifications in a list until we are in the loop and loop again to notify when exiting the first loop without error ? _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
