On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 09:34:36 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thank you for kindly explanation. I'll take this into account. I confirmed > memory resouce controller should not get tasks's cgroup directly from "task" > and should get it from "mm->owner". > And this means the whole thread group's memory related cgroup can be changed when mm->owner is changed. I'm not sure this is not a problem but it seems complex. Thanks, -Kame _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers