On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 11:23 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > > Yeah that's insurmountable - notice the stack in the process which was > fork()ed to be the restarted process topped at bfcab000, while the > checkpointed stack topped at bfdae000. You're not allowed to write > above the stack. So the only things to do are > > 1. keep trying the restart in the hopes you get a task with > stack topping at or above bfdae000 > 2. if the checkpointed stack is too high to be likely to be > restartable, generate a new checkpoint image and you > should get a lower stack top. > > (Dave, maybe you had other ideas I haven't considered) Have you tried turning of stack randomization? It should make the stack more dependable at exec. We could also provide a hint somewhere on exec() where to place the stack. -- Dave _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
