Hi Nishimura-san, Thanks good point out. >> +#include <linux/res_counter.h> > I don't think it's needed. > Or, are you planning to implement this feature by using res_counter? your are right. my early version use res_counter, but it isn't used currently. >> + spin_lock(&taskcg->lock); >> + if (max_tasks < taskcg->nr_tasks) >> + return -EBUSY; > need spin_unlock(). Yes, of cource. I'll fix it. Thanks! _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
