On Thu, 22 May 2008 15:13:41 +0900 Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi. > > I updated my swapcgroup patch. > seems good in general. > Major changes from previous version(*1): > - Rebased on 2.6.26-rc2-mm1 + KAMEZAWA-san's performance > improvement patchset v4. > - Implemented as a add-on to memory cgroup. > So, there is no need to add a new member to page_cgroup now. > - (NEW)Modified vm_swap_full() to calculate the rate of > swap usage per cgroup. > > Patchs: > - [1/4] add cgroup files > - [2/4] add member to swap_info_struct for cgroup > - [3/4] implement charge/uncharge > - [4/4] modify vm_swap_full for cgroup > > ToDo: > - handle force_empty. Without this, we can do rmdir() against cgroup with swap. right ? > - make it possible for users to select if they use > this feature or not, and avoid overhead for users > not using this feature. > - move charges along with task move between cgroups. > I think memory-controller's anon pages should also do this.... But how do you think about shared entries ? Thanks, -Kame _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers