Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > > Are you going to split this patch? As is it looks rather huge :) > Sure >> TODO's/Open Questions >> >> 1. We need to hold cgroup_mutex while walking through the children >> in reclaim. We need to figure out the best way to do so. Should >> cgroups provide a helper function/macro for it? >> 2. Do not allow children to have a limit greater than their parents. >> 3. Allow the user to select if hierarchial support is required >> 4. Fine tune reclaim from children logic >> > > I though about it recently. Can we have a cgroup file, which will > control whether to attach a res_counter to the parent? This will > address the YEMEMOTO's question about the performance. > It's one of the TODOS -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
