On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:16 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Maybe it would be better to not do a cgroup_exit() until we're > > > unhashed, so that cgroup_enable_task_cg_list() can't find the exiting > > > task? > > So we won't be doing what Paul suggested? > It's not as high a priority as Li's bug fix (which may be a good candidate for 2.6.25.1) but for the future I think I'll implement this distinguished css_set pointer for tasks that have finished cgroup_exit(), since I think it will make the similar synchronization in attach_task() cleaner, as well as cgroup_enable_task_cg_list(). Paul _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
