serge@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> I'm just worried about the accumulation of what feels like ad hoc >> namespaces, causing a very large combination matrix, a lot of which don't >> make sense. > > Hmm, if we were to just call this CLONE_NEWDEV, would that (a) make > sense and (b) suitably address your (certainly valid) concern? > > Basically for now CLONE_NEWDEV wouldn't yet be fully implemented, only > unsharing unix98 ptys... That would make sense to me. Also see Eric's note about uevent, however; and there are probably other issues like it. -hpa _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
