> On 4/1/08, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > --- a/include/linux/cgroup_subsys.h > > > > > +++ b/include/linux/cgroup_subsys.h > > > > > @@ -42,3 +42,9 @@ SUBSYS(mem_cgroup) > > > > > #endif > > > > > > > > > > /* */ > > > > > + > > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_DEVICE > > > > > +SUBSYS(devices) > > > > > +#endif > > > > > + > > > > > +/* */ > > > > > > > > I don't know what this is, but it does not look like C... > > > > > > Huh? > > > > Empty comments as separators? > > They help when multiple people add such SUBSYS things and > do not have to fight rejects. > Why not provide a interface to add subsystems at run-time instead? Are there any reason for not letting a subsystem to be implemented as a loadable module? IOW make cgroups usable by modules? Thanks Nikanth Karthikesan _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers