Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xemul@xxxxxxxxxx): > sukadev@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > Devpts namespace patchset > > > > In continuation of the implementation of containers in mainline, we need to > > support multiple PTY namespaces so that the PTY index (ie the tty names) in > > one container is independent of the PTY indices of other containers. For > > instance this would allow each container to have a '/dev/pts/0' PTY and > > refer to different terminals. > > > > [PATCH 1/7]: Propagate error code from devpts_pty_new > > [PATCH 2/7]: Factor out PTY index allocation > > [PATCH 3/7]: Enable multiple mounts of /dev/pts > > [PATCH 4/7]: Implement get_pts_ns() and put_pts_ns() > > [PATCH 5/7]: Determine pts_ns from a pty's inode. > > [PATCH 6/7]: Check for user-space mount of /dev/pts > > [PATCH 7/7]: Enable cloning PTY namespaces > > > > Todo: > > - This patchset depends on availability of additional clone flags. > > and relies on on Cedric's clone64 patchset. > > But this set was not even reviewed, wasn't it? Well it was sent out! :) Last time was Feb 11. There'd been no responses so while Cedric has been maintaining it, I suspect he hasn't wanted to gratuitously spam the list with countless resends. > Does anybody > know what are the plans about exhausted flags? hopefully "go with clone64/unshare64" :) -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
