On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 20:34:22 +0900 (JST) Hirokazu Takahashi <taka@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > And, blist seems to be just used for force_empty. > > Do you really need this ? no alternative ? > > I selected this approach because it was the simplest way for the > first implementation. > > I've been also thinking about what you pointed. > If you don't mind taking a long time to remove a bio cgroup, it will be > the easiest way that you can scan all pages to find the pages which > belong to the cgroup and delete them. It may be enough since you may > say it will rarely happen. But it might cause some trouble on machines > with huge memory. > Hmm, force_empty itself is necessary ? Thanks, -Kame _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
