Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > Benjamin Thery wrote: >> Eric, Pavel, >> >> I haven't followed everything about the sysfs/netns issue recently and I >> think I have missed some of its recent developments in the past weeks. >> So I'm wondering what is the current status? Is anyone still working on it? > > I'm thinking on it, but have no graceful solution :( Sysfs is a big... > no - HUUUUUUUUUUGE problem. Agreed. >> As several netns patches for IPv4 and IPv6 have already been merged in >> net-2.6.26, it would be great to have the sysfs part also to help people >> who want test netns. >> Right now, it is a pain to boot and test a system with CONFIG_SYSFS=n. >> >> (I know the problem is not trivial and won't be easy to solve. I just >> want to be sure it is not forgotten) > > It is (unfortunately) not. > >> Pavel, I've heard you sent (or have) a patch that prevents sysfs access >> from a "child" netns. A patch that can be a good workaround until we >> have the full thing ready. I can't find it in mailing lists archives, >> can you give some hints about where to find it? :) > > Hm. I haven't had plans to do such things actually. Oh, that explains why I didn't find it :) I must have misunderstood what I heard... > >> Thanks a lot. >> >> Benjamin >> > > > -- B e n j a m i n T h e r y - BULL/DT/Open Software R&D http://www.bull.com _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers