>> At first look, remembering mm struct is not very good. >> Remembering swap controller itself is better. > >The swap_cgroup when the page(and page_cgroup) is allocated and >the swap_cgroup when the page is going to be swapped out may be >different by swap_cgroup_move_task(), so I think swap_cgroup >to be charged should be determined at the point of swapout. > Accounting swap against an entity which allocs anon memory is not strange. Problem here is move_task itself. Now, charges against anon is not moved when a task which uses it is moved. please fix this behavior first if you think this is problematic. But, finally, a daemon driven by process event connector determines the group before process starts using anon. It's doubtful that it's worth to add complicated/costly ones. Thanks, -Kame _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
