On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 09:56:13PM -0800, Paul Menage wrote: > Hi Kazunaga, > > On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Kazunaga Ikeno <k-ikeno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi - > > > > This is a patch of a new optional function for task assignment to cgroup, RFC. > > > > > > == Purpose ================================================= > > > > To provide the function that leads a task, corresponding to the conditions specified > > beforehand, to a specific cgroup directory. > > > > This is something that's been discussed before, originally as part of > CKRM with a complex rule engine in the kernel space. > > Basically, the general agreement was that it's a case where a simple > API is going to be too simple for the majority of users, and a complex > API that satisfies everyone is going to be too messy/heavyweight. > > This is something that can be done in a userspace daemon via the > process events connector - when you get a PROC_EVENT_UID event, you > can move the process into the appropriate cgroup (you may also need to > check any recently-forked children). This also gives you more > flexibility than you can have in the kernel - you can base your > decision on more complex factors than simply the uid of the process. > > Dhaval Giani had a prototype implementation of such a daemon. > The daemon was posted at http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/553267 . At that point control groups were called containers. These corrections will have to made for it to run. If I can get the time, I will clean it up and try to put it up somewhere. Thanks, -- regards, Dhaval _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
