Rick Jones wrote: > Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Some performance tests was made by Benjamin to watch out the impact of >> the network namespace. The good news is there is no impact when used >> with or without namespaces. That has been checked using a real network >> device inside a network namespace. > > The *_RR tests seem to show a drop in througput and corresponding > increases in service demand - could that be because things like TSO et > al cannot mask much of anything in the way of a path-length increase? Hmm. In fact Benjamin took the 2.6.23.16 kernel where there were no network namespace code at all. So these differences between 2.6.23.16 and 2.6.25-rc1 does not show a performance degradation especially related to the network namespaces. The important point is the 2.6.25-rc1 without ipv6 netns and 2.6.25-rc1 with ipv6 netns code applied, I mean the second and the third line and we can point that the ipv6 netns code does not degrade performances for either throughput and service demand. > From the annotations, I'm ass-u-me-ing that NS was only used on the > netperf side and not both netperf and netserver side? right :) > happy benchmarking, Thanks Rick. -- Daniel _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
