Nadia Derbey wrote:
Matt Helsley wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 18:16 +0100, Nadia Derbey wrote:
<snip>
+#define MAX_MSGQUEUES 16 /* MSGMNI as defined in linux/msg.h */
+
It's not quite the maximum anymore, is it? More like the minumum
maximum ;). A better name might better document what the test is
actually trying to do.
One question I have is whether the unpatched test is still valuable.
Based on my limited knowledge of the test I suspect it's still a correct
test of message queues. If so, perhaps renaming the old test (so it's
not confused with a performance regression) and adding your patched
version is best?
So, here's the new patch based on Matt's points.
Subrata, it has to be applied on top of the original ltp-full-20080131.
Please tell me if you'd prefer one based on the merged version you've
got (i.e. with my Tuesday patch applied).
Forgot the patch, sorry for that (thx Andrew).
Regards,
Nadia
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
