Matt Helsley wrote: > On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 18:16 +0100, Nadia Derbey wrote: > > <snip> > >>+#define MAX_MSGQUEUES 16 /* MSGMNI as defined in linux/msg.h */ >>+ > > > It's not quite the maximum anymore, is it? More like the minumum > maximum ;). A better name might better document what the test is > actually trying to do. > > One question I have is whether the unpatched test is still valuable. > Based on my limited knowledge of the test I suspect it's still a correct > test of message queues. If so, perhaps renaming the old test (so it's > not confused with a performance regression) and adding your patched > version is best? > Yes, you're completely right. I'll resend a patch today. Regards, Nadia _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
