On Feb 18, 2008 1:45 AM, Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > But we don't have /proc/proc.api or /sys/sysfs.api ... True. And /proc is a bit of a mess. Having a similar API file for sysfs sounds like a good idea to me. > > And is it better to describe the debug subsystem too? > Yes, probably, but that would be a separate patch to the debug subsystem itself, not the main cgroups code. Paul _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers