Li Zefan wrote: > Paul Menage wrote: >> On Feb 16, 2008 2:07 AM, Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Paul Menage wrote: >>> >>> Hi, Paul, >>> >>> Do we need to use a cgroup.api file? Why not keep up to date documentation and >>> get users to use that. I fear that, cgroup.api will not be kept up-to-date, >>> leading to confusion. >> The cgroup.api file isn't meant to give complete documentation for a >> control file, simply a brief indication of its usage. >> > > But we don't have /proc/proc.api or /sys/sysfs.api ... > Yes, doing that would make the size of the kernel go out of control. >> The aim is that most bits of the information reported in cgroup.api >> are auto-generated, so there shouldn't be problems with it getting >> out-of-date. >> >> Is it just the space used by the documentation string that you're >> objecting to? The other function of the file is to declare a type for >> each variable. >> I like the documentation aspect, it is the space that I object to. -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
