On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:51:59 +0300 "Denis V. Lunev" <den@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I could hardly imagine why sombady needs to assign 0.0.0.0 as an interface > address or interface destination address. The kernel will behave in a strage > way in several places if this is possible, as ifa_local != 0 is considered > as initialized/non-initialized state of the ifa. > > Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@xxxxxxxxxx> > This is used as a way to bring device up in lots of existing documentation. So please don't change. -- Stephen Hemminger <stephen.hemminger@xxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
