Re: OLS2008 "namespaces status update" report

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Guess we can have both. BOF format is a bit different (not too much time, more people), so better to have mini-summit first.

BTW does anybody knows whether the Kernel Summit will be "attached" to OLS this year?

Denis V. Lunev wrote:
By the way, may be it is better to request a BOF rather than mini-summit
to have a presentation of our work for a "outside" world...

Regards,
	Den

Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
Cedric Le Goater wrote:
Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
Hi, guys.

We're coming up to the deadline of proposals submissions for
OLS2008 and I noticed, that we didn't decide whether we're
going to make some summary report about the namespaces/cgroups
development status.

I think it worth making this one.
OK. Let's work on an abstract.
Fine :) Actually the main question is - who will be responsible for this talk. If nobody objects I can take care of it ;)

Besides, we can send a request for a mini-summit.
Yes !
:)

C.

Thanks,
Pavel



_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux