On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 20:08 +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > The logic behind EPERM, is that this failure is only for unprivileged > callers. ENOMEM is too specifically about OOM. It could be changed > to ENOSPC, ENFILE, EMFILE, or it could remain EPERM. What do others > think? Since you're patching mount anyway, maybe you could add a little pointer for people to go check the sysctl if they get a certain error code back from here. -- Dave _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
