On 16/12/2007, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > * Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > --- a/kernel/sched.c > > +++ b/kernel/sched.c > > @@ -7360,7 +7360,7 @@ void sched_move_task(struct task_struct *tsk) > > > > update_rq_clock(rq); > > > > - running = task_running(rq, tsk); > > + running = (rq->curr == tsk); > > on_rq = tsk->se.on_rq; > > thanks, i've queued this up (pending more testing). btw., sched_setscheduler() and rt_mutex_setprio() are also affected (in general, anything that may call put_prev_task/set_curr_task() relying task_running()). Will see, maybe we may come up with smth better than just replacing task_running() with (rq->curr == tsk) there. > Btw., you should be able to force the ia64 scheduling by adding this to > the very top of include/linux/sched.h: > > #define __ARCH_WANT_UNLOCKED_CTXSW > #define __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW Yeah, with both we even get ARM behavior. Can be a good test indeed. > > Ingo > -- Best regards, Dmitry Adamushko _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
