On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 11:22:08AM +0100, Dmitry Adamushko wrote: > On 14/12/2007, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 14 Dec 2007, Dmitry Adamushko wrote: > > > > > > > > argh... it's a consequence of the 'current is not kept within the tree" indeed. > > > > > > > Thanks Dmitry for tracking this down. > > My analysis was flawed (hmm... me was under control of Belgium beer :-) > > The task in not on the runqueue (p->on_rq == 0) at the moment when > put_prev_task_fair() and set_curr_task_fair() get its turn in > sched_move_task()... so dequeue/enqueue_entity() are not triggered, > that's good. > Again, I am probably missing something, but if on_rq == 0, then how is set_curr_task_fair() getting called? -- regards, Dhaval _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
