"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx): >> >> Currently init drops all signals including SIGKILL that are sent to it >> that it does not ignore and does have a handler for. Extending this to > > Description is crucial in this patchset, so should the above not be: > > "does not have a handler for" Yes. It should say "does not have a handler for." Instead of "does have a handler for." Oops. I thought that was what I wrote! > > ? Eric _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
