Eric W. Biederman wrote: > There is no real additional cost in using task_active_pid_ns and > by doing so it means we do not need to audit the callers of pid_vnr > closely, to ensure they are always called on living processes. > > Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > kernel/pid.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/pid.c b/kernel/pid.c > index 54d7634..a7ecfce 100644 > --- a/kernel/pid.c > +++ b/kernel/pid.c > @@ -444,7 +444,7 @@ pid_t pid_nr_ns(struct pid *pid, struct pid_namespace *ns) > > pid_t pid_vnr(struct pid *pid) > { > - return pid_nr_ns(pid, current->nsproxy->pid_ns); > + return pid_nr_ns(pid, task_active_pid_ns(current)); NAK. Your version will make more dereferences and one condition check (if (pid != NULL)). Besides, dead process can never call this thing - it is even never scheduled for execution. > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pid_vnr); > _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers