Quoting sukadev@xxxxxxxxxx (sukadev@xxxxxxxxxx):
> Oleg Nesterov [oleg@xxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
> | On 12/05, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> | >
> | > +pid_t pid_vnr(struct pid *pid)
> | > +{
> | > + return pid_nr_ns(pid, current->nsproxy->pid_ns);
> | > +}
>
> Hmm. current->nsproxy be NULL during process exit ?
> So this safe as long as pid_vnr() is not called after a
> process exits its namespaces. Probably no such callers atm.
Yes I did a little audit for those this morning bc I frankly didn't
believe there weren't any. But I couldn't find any :)
-serge
> |
> | Excellent!!!
> |
> | This allows us to do many cleanups. I am sending the trivial patch just
> | as example.
> |
> | Oleg.
> _______________________________________________
> Containers mailing list
> Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
