On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 19:55:05 +0530 Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > KAMEZAWA-San, what happens if we use a little less aggressive set of > watermarks, something like > > 700/300 > will test today. you mean low=300M, high=700M, limit=800M case ? > Can we keep the defaults something close to what each zone uses? > pages_low, pages_high and pages_min. > After review of Pavel-san, "don't define *default* value" style is used here. If we use default value, we'll have to detect "we should adjust high/low watermarks when the limit changes." That will complicate things and may crash the system administrators policy. It's not havey work to adjust high/low limit to sutitable value (which was defined against the workload by system admin) at setting limit. Thanks, -kame _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
