Re: [RFC][ only for review ] memory controller bacground reclaim [4/5] high/low watermark for memory controller

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Dec 1, 2007 2:45 AM, Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > which would correspond to a line in the "mem.api" auto-generated control file as
> >
>
> The user is expected to cat "memory.api" in order to figure out how to
> use the file?
>

Yes, the very first time they try to use a particular cgroup, if
they've not bothered to read any documentation about it. There has to
be some documentation *somewhere*, and putting some of the basic bits
at a point where they're immediately accessible could be an advantage.

Paul
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux