Re: [PATCH 1/2] namespaces: introduce sys_hijack (v10)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mark Nelson <markn@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hi Paul and Eric,
>
> Do you guys have any objections to dropping the hijack_pid() and
> hijack_cgroup() parts of sys_hijack, leaving just hijack_ns() (see
> below for discussion)?

I need to step back and study what is being proposed.

My gut feeling is that you are proposing something that does not
support forking me a process inside a container so I can have a
shell without having to run a login program.

There is a reason I proposed ptrace as an initial prototype.

All of the other uses of enter in a namespace context I feel confident
we can support by just having proper virtual filesystems available
to processes outside of the container.  For monitoring and control.

Eric
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux