On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:52:34 +0100 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > +1. Both the IPC and the PID namespaces provide IDs to address
> > + object inside the kernel. E.g. semaphore with ipcid or
> > + process group with pid.
> > +
> > + In both cases, tasks shouldn't try exposing this id to some
> > + other task living in a different namespace via a shared filesystem
> > + or IPC shmem/message. The fact is that this ID is only valid
> > + within the namespace it was obtained in and may refer to some
> > + other object in another namespace.
> > +
> > +2. Intentionnaly, two equal user ids in different user namespaces
> Intentionaly
Intentionally,
> > + should not be equal from the VFS point of view. In other
> > + words, user 10 in one user namespace shouldn't have the same
> > + access permissions to files, beloging to user 10 in another
> belonging
> > + namespace. But currently this is not so.
> > +
---
~Randy
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
