On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:57:37 +0900 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think there is a consensus that memory controller needs per-zone lru. > But it was postphoned that it seems some people tries to modify lru of zones. > > Now, "scan" value, in mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(), handling is fixed. So, > demand of implementing per-zone-lru is raised. > > This patch implements per-zone lru for memory cgroup. > I think this patch's style implementation can be adjusted to zone's lru > implementation changes if happens. > I noticed this patch doesn't handle memory migration in sane way. I will fix in the next version. -Kame _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
