On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 07:14:22 +0000 (GMT) Hugh Dickins <hugh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If we're charging rss and we're charging cache, it seems obvious that > we should be charging swapcache - as has been done. But in practice > that doesn't work out so well: both swapin readahead and swapoff leave > the majority of pages charged to the wrong cgroup (the cgroup that > happened to read them in, rather than the cgroup to which they belong). > Thank you. I welcome this patch :) Could I confirm a change in the logic ? * Before this patch, wrong swapcache charge is added to one who called try_to_free_page(). * After this patch, anonymous page's charge will drop to 0 when page_remove_rmap() is called. Regards, -Kame _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
