Pavel Emelyanov wrote: > Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> Denis V. Lunev wrote: >>> Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>> >>>> * the first one is the locking of the network namespace list by >>>> rtnl_lock, so from the timer callback we can not browse the network >>>> namespace list to check the age of the routes. It is a problem I would >>>> like to talk with Denis if he has time >>> From my point of view, the situation is clear. The timer should be >>> per/namespace. The situation is completely different as one in IPv4. >> We thought to make a timer per namespace for ipv6, but we are a little >> afraid for the performances when there will be a lot of containers. >> Anyway, we can do a timer per namespace and optimize that later. I will >> cook a new patch to take into account that for the next week. > > I propose to start a new mailing thread for net namespaces discussions > or at least change this one's subject ;) done. C. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers