Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> +2. Intentionnaly, two equal user ids in different user namespaces >> + should not be equal from the VFS point of view. In other >> + words, user 10 in one user namespace shouldn't have the same >> + access permissions to files, beloging to user 10 in another >> + namespace. But currently this is not so. > > I don't know where this is going to land for a final call. > But if the pid namespace has a chance of landing under CONFIG_BROKEN > for the final stable release. I prefered immature but he, any config name would do, just to make sure it doesn't get shipped by default in distros > We seriously want to consider the user namespace for the same treatment. > We all seem to agree that it is incomplete. yes. C. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
