Re: [RFC][ for -mm] memory cgroup enhancements take3 [1/9] fix try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages() numa handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 23:58:00 +0530
Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 20:14 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> >> -       for_each_online_node(node) {
> >> -               zones =
> >> NODE_DATA(node)->node_zonelists[target_zone].zones;
> >> -               if (do_try_to_free_pages(zones, sc.gfp_mask, &sc))
> >> +       zones = NODE_DATA(node)->node_zonelists[target_zone].zones;
> >> +       if (do_try_to_free_pages(zones, sc.gfp_mask, &sc))
> >>                         return 1;
> >> -       }
> >>         return 0;
> >>  }
> >>  #endif 
> > 
> > Am I reading the diff wrong, or is that return indented too far?
> > 
> > -- Dave
> 
> Good catch! It is indeed indented one additional tab away from where it
> should be.

Thanks, I'll check my tree.

-Kame

_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux