Kirill Korotaev <dev@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I dislike this patch: > it's not scalable/efficient to travers all the tasks > while we know the pid namespace we care about. Well the unix way is to implement it simple and stupid and then to optimize, where needed. We don't currently have a per pid namespace list of processes or tasks. This is a trivial bug fix patch, and I wanted the review to be as simple as possible. I don't expect people are doing kill -1 all that frequently as it is a bit rude. I have no problem doing find_ge_pid and then looking in the hash table like we do in /proc. It likely will have fewer conflicts, but that is a bit harder to review, and is actually more code. Eric _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
