Adrian Bunk <bunk@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > There isn't any hard semantics behind what is marked EXPERIMENTAL and > what not. In it's current state, we could even consider removing the > EXPERIMENTAL option and all dependencies on EXPERIMENTAL. Well I do know at least some of the things that depend on experimental are legitimate. I wonder if the problem is that we don't police experimental well enough. > Currently CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL=n would cost a distribution a three digit > number of device drivers plus several features like e.g. NFSv4. I can see a distribution carefully cherry picking things, that the have an intimate knowledge about out of experimental but it doesn't sound right for taking things out of EXPERIMENTAL to be routine. I know I'm a little slow about getting around to it but when ever I have a feature that isn't EXPERIMENTAL anymore I remove the tag. Eric _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
