Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Guys how complete do you fee the pid namespace support is that > has been merged into Linus's tree? > > My impression until I started reading through code earlier today > was that the support was just about done except for a couple of > tricky details. Yes It looks sane. Here's what I have in mind : * there are some patches from suka that make sure the pid namespace init is not getting abusively killed by one of this children * the pid cleanup is not complete . locks . kthread (i should work soon on improving kthread to support signals) IMO, the proc mount shouldn't be under the pid namespace. we will need that sooner or later. C. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers