On 10/22/07, Balbir Singh <balbir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I think we also need the notion of load, like we have in cpu_acct.c Yes, a notion of load would be good - but the "load" calculated by cpu_acct.c isn't all that useful yet - it's just a total of the CPU cycles used in the 10 second time interval prior to the current interval. Something that's more analagous to the real machine load would be nice, and I hope the numbers could be made available via CFS. > Don't we need to do a css_get() on the cgrp to ensure that the cgroup > does not go away if it's empty and someone does an rmdir on it? See my other email. Yes, I think we need more here, but probably something more generic. Paul _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
