On 10/16/07, Serge E. Hallyn <serue@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > pid, but wasn't sure how best to identify the cgroup. Originally I was > more worried about pid exiting/wraparound, but then decided that with a > real container the container_init can't go away until the container goes > away anyway. For those "real containers" that have init. Not everything is going to need that level of virtualization, particularly if you're primarily interested in isolation. > > Anyway, I can go ahead and add 'int which' to the parameter list now, > and leave the details of how to specify a cgroup for later. That way at > least the api won't fundamentally change again. Great, thanks. Paul _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
