On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 06:44:04AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > I would be interested in seeing what your patches look like. > > Sure. > > > I don't > > think that we should take any more sysfs changes for 2.6.24 as we do > > have a lot of them right now, and I don't think that Tejun and I agree > > on the future direction of the outstanding ones just yet. > > Sounds reasonable. > > > But I don't think that your multiple-mount patches could make it into > > .24, unless .23 is still weeks away. > > Well I have posted them all earlier. At this point I it makes most > sense to wait until after the big merge happen and every rebases on > top of that. Then everyone will have network namespace support and > it is easier to look through all of the patches. Especially since > it looks like the merge window will open any day now. > > I will quickly recap the essence of what I am looking at: > On directories of interest I tag all of their directory > entries with which namespace they belong to. On a mount > of sysfs I remember which namespace we were in when we > mounted sysfs. The I filter readdir and lookup based upon > the namespace I captured at mount time. I do my best > to generalize it so that the logic can work for different > namespaces. Ok, I have no objection to that. Let's wait for 2.6.24 to settle down :) thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers