KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote: > Hi, Balbir-san > This is a patch set against memory cgroup I have now. > Reflected comments I got. > > = > [1] charge refcnt fix patch - avoid charging against a page which is being > uncharged. > [2] fix-err-handling patch - remove unnecesary unlock_page_cgroup() > [3] lock and page->cgroup patch - add helper function for charge/uncharge > [4] avoid handling no LRU patch - makes mem_cgroup_isolate_pages() avoid > handling !Page_LRU pages. > [5] migration fix patch - a fix for page migration. > [6] force reclaim patch - add an interface for uncharging all pages in > empty cgroup. > = > Thank you very much for working on this. > BTW, which way would you like to go ? > > 1. You'll merge this set (and my future patch) to your set as > Memory Cgroup Maintainer and pass to Andrew Morton, later. > And we'll work against your tree. > 2. I post this set to the (next) -mm. And we'll work agaisnt -mm. > I think (2) is better. I don't maintain my own tree, so lets get all the fixes and enhancements into -mm > not as my usual patch, tested on x86-64 fake-NUMA. > I'll also test these patches. > Thanks, > -Kame > -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
