Re: [RFC] [PATCH] memory controller statistics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Forgot to mention one other detail, could we track the statistics
> in bytes? We track usage and limit in bytes currently. I am open
> to opinions on this, but the last time we discussed numbers,
> tracking bytes was the preferred approach.

while /proc/vmstat and others uses number of pages?
IMO, numbers of pages make more sense for this kind of statistics.

however, if there's a consensus, i can follow.  after all,
it's merely a matter of taste.

YAMAMOTO Takashi
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux