Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
The following patch change autobind fonction to use the ordernum
from the network namespace instead of using the local static variable.
Why do we care?
Information leak?
Some application is expecting a predictable autobind value?
Just skimming the code it looks like it will work correctly without
this.
I think my summary is ... too short :)
I don't see any applications taking care of this. If they ask for an abstract
socket, then they don't care about the bind result. So probably, the patchset is
totally useless.
But from the POV of the checkpoint/restart, we should check if this value is
somewhere visible from userspace and so storable by an application.
Right. And we already can already specifically select this result.
My point is that the semi random sequence generator logic does not
need to be per namespace, because people don't care what the sequence.
That sequence is not exported to user space.
It appears this is the case with /proc/net/unix, where an abstract socket is
symbolized by the path pattern "@". Example:
cat /proc/net/unix
Num RefCount Protocol Flags Type St Inode Path
c6a27710: 00000002 00000000 00000000 0002 01 4357 @00003
Right, and that part we should definitely preserve for checkpoint/restart
purposes.
I agree by the fact that can be considered as a detail and the probability to
have an application storing this informaton is very small ( eg. checkpointing
while doing netstat in the container ). But IMHO, the paradigm "never seen from
userspace" fails and that justifies to have the ordernum variable relative to a
namespace.
My point was that ordernum itself is not seen. It is just an arbitrary number
and we are allowed to change the algorithm for selecting a new abstract
namespace name at will.
Hmm, right. That makes sense.
If there is something in userspace that depends on the algorithm for selecting
the abstract name then making ordernum per namespace make sense.
Ok, fair enough. Let's forget this patch. It is small enough to rewrite
it if unexpectedly something bad happens with ordernum.
-- Daniel
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
