On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:12:13 +0200 Cedric Le Goater <clg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Cedric made a good point that we will have conflicts of code > > being added to the same place in nsproxy.c and the like. So > > I copied Andrew to give him a heads up. > > here's a suggestion, > > we could keep the net namespace unshare patch out of david's tree, > let andrew merge and release a new -mm and, then, send the net namespace > unshare patch to andrew. that should keep nsproxy out of the andrew's > merge challenge. But david's tree will miss the unshare part for a while. This patch only generates two rejects against the current -mm poop pile. That's insignificant. We don't need to do anything special to merge a little patch like this one. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
