From: ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman) Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 18:06:00 -0600 > I did that audit when I replied to Stephen the first time and I just > redid it to verify myself. We are calling functions that can fail > from the init function (kmalloc in the most common). So the > init function can fail. > > So short of adding a bunch of BUG_ON's to the kernel to trap those > failure cases we can't remove the backwards list walk. Especially > since I can initiate this code path as root by calling > "clone(CLONE_NEWNET...)". I just noticed that posting and thanks for reiterating. _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers
