Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 15:19 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > >> VM_BUG_ON(pc && !locked) > > Even better :-) > Good, I'll change it. >> I am not sure I understand this comment. > > Is that inc needed? the pc is already associated with the page and > should thus already have a reference, so this inc would do 1->2, but we > then set it to 1 again. seems like a superfluous operation. That is something I need to look into. I'll try and get to it soon. -- Warm Regards, Balbir Singh Linux Technology Center IBM, ISTL _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers