Re: [PATCH 23/29] memory controller memory accounting v7

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 15:19 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> 
>> VM_BUG_ON(pc && !locked)
> 
> Even better :-)
> 

Good, I'll change it.

>> I am not sure I understand this comment.
> 
> Is that inc needed? the pc is already associated with the page and
> should thus already have a reference, so this inc would do 1->2, but we
> then set it to 1 again. seems like a superfluous operation.

That is something I need to look into. I'll try and get to it soon.


-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL
_______________________________________________
Containers mailing list
Containers@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers

[Index of Archives]     [Cgroups]     [Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux